Harvard University has firmly rejected a letter from the Trump administration that outlined sweeping demands aimed at combating antisemitism on its campus. As we wrote on Friday, the letter’s stated needs are a good start. These went well beyond admissions, to changes in Harvard’s governance structure and hiring practices. Whatever the ultimate outcome, this development is an indication of an escalating war between the university and the feds. They are fighting over how to combat antisemitism and protect institutional autonomy.
The administration’s letter described ten specific changes. Harvard argues that all of these changes would endanger the independence of Harvard as a private institution. President Alan Garber’s adamant opposition to the administration’s request went a long way. He claimed that it “violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights,” that it “exceeds” its authority, and “threatens our values as a private institution.” Harvard’s financial ties to the federal government are significant, at $256 million. This new total reflects dozens of contracts and grants in the more than 370 pages of documents that the administration has released and continues to review.
Columbia University has acceded to most of the administration’s requests. This disparity raises questions about the potential implications for universities that choose to comply with federal mandates versus those that prioritize institutional autonomy.
It was a very Garberly thing to say, uncharacteristically bullish and provocative. He underscored that it will not give up its constitutional powers in response to the administration’s intimidation tactics. The Trump administration has indicated that compliance with federal antidiscrimination laws is a prerequisite for universities wishing to receive federal funding.
This is how the White House has defended the planned changes. They claim that universities need to protect their bottom line with the federal government. Former President Donald Trump has blamed top universities for not doing enough to protect Jewish students. He argues that these institutions have resulted in an establishment leftist bias.
Even as the fight over the case shifts, Harvard continues to dig in its heels. The university’s leadership have signaled their intention to follow through with their principles. Or they’ll push back on any outside forces that put in jeopardy their values and mission.
