Air Canada Strike: Minister Orders Arbitration to Resolve Dispute

Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Minister of Jobs, has taken decisive action to address the ongoing strike involving Air Canada flight attendants. On Saturday, she ordered the Canada Industrial Relations Board to intervene. They must compel Air Canada and the union representing its flight attendants to go back to work and have them arbitrate their disagreements to…

Lucas Nguyen Avatar

By

Air Canada Strike: Minister Orders Arbitration to Resolve Dispute

Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Minister of Jobs, has taken decisive action to address the ongoing strike involving Air Canada flight attendants. On Saturday, she ordered the Canada Industrial Relations Board to intervene. They must compel Air Canada and the union representing its flight attendants to go back to work and have them arbitrate their disagreements to finality. The intervention took place shortly after the strike began in earnest, at 12:58 a.m. ET Saturday morning. This escalation came on the heels of failed bargaining efforts between the airlines and union.

After a pretty dismal negotiation session with both sides Friday night, Hajdu decided to call it. She pointed out that talks had collapsed, with both sides too far apart to settle the dispute quickly. More than 10,000 flight attendants who were represented by the union suffered the effects of the strike. This was the unique circumstance that forced the minister to intervene (unprecedentedly) under Section 107 of the Labour Code. This section leaves a great deal of room for disputes to be sent to the labour board in an attempt to maintain industrial peace.

Breakdown in Negotiations

The union, headed by Wesley Lesosky, called the strike. This was why they were unable to achieve a deal at the last minute with Air Canada, after eight months of bargaining. Air Canada needlessly made matters worse by locking out its agents a half-hour after the strike started. It was this action that led to a massive disruption of operations.

At first, Hajdu was encouraged that an agreement might be achievable. That hope evaporated rapidly during her initial meeting with both sides at the negotiating table. She underlined that a continued work stoppage would ground thousands of Canadians, both outside of Canada and within domestic airspace. She termed this situation “absolutely not acceptable at all of us.”

“With both parties declaring an impasse in negotiations, with valuable cargo grounded and passengers stranded, the government made the right decision to refer the two sides to binding arbitration,” – Matthew Holmes, head of public policy for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

Most notably, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce warned that Canada’s economy could face severe consequences from the strike. Without any consultation, they threatened to throw close to a million Canadians into disarray with unnecessary travel delays. This developing labor dispute has already caused a wave of widespread cancellations and struggle to maintain operations.

Reactions from Union Leaders and Politicians

Labor’s response Federal government intervention has generated mixed reactions from union leaders and political opponents. That’s what prompted a withering of this reaction from Unifor’s National President, Lana Payne. She announced that this move should send a message to federal employers that they can’t escape meaningful bargaining.

“Don’t worry about having to bargain. We got you,” – Lana Payne.

She warned that the curtailing of workers rights does not ensure long-term labor tranquility. Other labour leaders have voiced similar concerns, that union intervention from government is harmful to the fight for workers rights.

Wesley Lesosky was one of the most outspoken critics of the government’s actions. He blasted them as hypocrites for calling for good faith negotiations at the bargaining table but intervening on behalf of Air Canada.

“The Liberals are violating our Charter rights to take job action and give Air Canada exactly what they want: hours and hours of unpaid labour from underpaid flight attendants, while the company pulls in sky-high profits and extraordinary executive compensation,” – Wesley Lesosky.

Opposition reaction NDP Leader Don Davies immediately denounced Hajdu’s move as a “blatant abuse” of Section 107 of the Labour Code. We were encouraged by his continued insistence that Parliament be recalled to experience a robust democratic debate on any back-to-work legislation.

“Recall Parliament and democratically debate back-to-work legislation, if they feel it’s justified,” – Don Davies.

Economic Implications and Future Outlook

As this strike drags on, fears about its effects on American travelers and the Canadian economy grow. Patty Hajdu pointed out that canceled flights had already inflicted “significant harm” on the national economy and adversely affected traveling Canadians.

The intervention asks the court to restore service via binding arbitration. It’s considered a key move to head off massive outages and disruptions. Hajdu is still optimistic that a resolution can come through arbitration. In the background, both sides continue to prepare for the next stages in this complex legal battle.

Lucas Nguyen Avatar