In a bold political move, Britain, Canada, and Australia have all officially recognized the State of Palestine. This decision is a major, unwarranted change to US foreign policy and further isolates Israel diplomatically. That award is announced as moral outrage around the world over the humanitarian catastrophe that has unfolded in Gaza grows after a dramatic escalation of Israeli violence. In a video address, British prime minister Keir Starmer made clear this would end today. He said that the recognition is meant to give strength to those in favor of peaceful coexistence and weaken Hamas.
The British Foreign Office has just taken a tourism advisory, which typically warns against visiting dangerous areas, to a whole new level. It currently mentions “Palestine” instead of “Occupied Palestinian Territories.” This change signals a larger trend in the growing acceptance of the Palestinian statehood narrative in international diplomacy. Starmer emphasized that this recognition would not only support peace efforts but serve as a countermeasure against extremist groups.
Starmer’s pledge to officially recognize Palestine first became public in July. He qualified this recognition with some specific caveats. These are Israel agreeing to a humanitarian relief ceasefire and committing to moving toward a two-state solution. With this recent announcement, Canada and the UK have gone further, showing real leadership. Despite Japan, Italy and Germany’s strong opposition, they have become the first G7 countries to officially recognize Palestine.
In fact, over 140 other UN member states already recognize Palestine, including all of the other non-member observer states such as the Vatican. Countries are trying to address the increasing outcry over the scale of Israel’s military assault in Gaza. Humanitarian organizations have labeled these actions as catastrophic, sparking a wave of popular condemnation.
Israel’s President Isaac Herzog denounced the recognitions, claiming that these types of acknowledgments would create no goodwill for peace. He criticized the decision by stating:
“This is a sad day for those who seek true peace.” – Isaac Herzog
Herzog claimed that if the world really wanted the hostages freed, they wouldn’t recognize Palestine. He rightly cautioned that it will not bring about a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians. His statements were quickly mirrored by far-right members of the Israeli government. They’ve called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to move to annex the entirely occupied West Bank, all in reaction to the changing international scene.
Netanyahu himself has remained staunchly opposed to the idea of a Palestinian state, asserting emphatically that:
“There will be no Palestinian state.” – Benjamin Netanyahu
Palestine’s recognition goes well beyond these three countries. Belgium, Luxembourg, and San Marino are similarly expected to proclaim their recognition later this week. France and several other countries are expected to follow suit during discussions at the United Nations General Assembly. This swell of new momentum marks a clear turning of the tide in international relations regarding Palestine and Israel.
The path for Palestine to obtain full United Nations membership is still murky. At least nine out of fifteen members of the Security Council must approve. Second, none of the five permanent members may exercise their veto power. It is the United States’ prerogative to veto bad resolutions in the Security Council. Consequently, the outlook for Palestinian statehood at the UN is unclear.
He went on to say that he wanted both states—Palestine and Israel—to live in peace. Former Canadian Finance Minister Mark Carney supported this view. He further stated that through acknowledging Palestine, we can work together to build towards a future of peace.
“In the face of growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace.” – Keir Starmer
One other senior Canadian government official went out of his way to underline Canada’s position. They noted that the PA has abandoned violence, accepted Israel’s right to exist, and is dedicated to a two-state solution. This announcement represents a remarkable change in the dynamics of diplomatic recognition and relationships in the region.
“We recognize the State of Palestine and offer our partnership in building the promise of a peaceful future for both the State of Palestine and the State of Israel.” – Mark Carney
As global leaders respond to these developments, it becomes increasingly clear that the recognition of Palestine may offer new avenues for dialogue and peace negotiations. While the funding may be welcomed, skepticism remains about its actual impact on achieving lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
As global leaders respond to these developments, it becomes increasingly clear that the recognition of Palestine may offer new avenues for dialogue and peace negotiations. However, skepticism remains regarding its actual impact on achieving lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
